Archive
NFP vs Contraception, 7 skits
As I was looking for videos about IPF, I ran across these short skits about the difference between Natural Family Planning (NFP) and Contraception. These skits were used for a final project by seminarians at IPF for the course on Christian Spirituality & Sexuality. Finding these skits is God’s Providence (a “God-incidence”) since our high school Confirmation class is asking a lot of questions about Catholic Matrimony, birth control and their Catholic identity. — Check them out!
NFP vs Contraception #1: “It’s about the relationship”
Contraception, does NOT need to communicate about their fertility
NFP, (1) DOES need to communicate (which builds the relationship),
(2) doesn’t have to worry about fertility altering chemicals (that could hurt your chances of getting pregnant even when you stop taking pills,
(3) doesn’t have to worry (as much) about a “testy” wife from hormone manipulations,
(4) doesn’t have to worry about a decrease in libedo (sexual desire)
NFP vs Contraception #2, “It takes two.”
NFP, (1) builds trust and imtimacy with the greater need for communication,
(2) experience a full self-giving to each other (not holding back their fertility),
(3) statistically, couple doing NFP stay together longer, less divorce.
NFP vs Contraception #3, “It’s natural.”
Contraception introduces a couple to chemicals, while NFP is natural (the way God’s designed us), so it’s healthier.
NFP vs Contraception #4, “Know the facts.”
Contraception is potrayed in the media more than NFP.
NFP is taught in churches around the world. Even some Protestants practice NFP.
The facts can be lost. www.onemoresoul.com
NFP vs Contraception #5, “Demand the whole story.”
Contraception may come with divorce, abortion, infertility, and mysogyny. The media can minimize these possibilities.
NFP may come with life-long marriage, health, love, and respect. www.onemoresoul.com
NFP vs Contraception #6, “It’s not a tough choice.”
Contraception is the answer of many to poverty in third-world nations. Sometimes it is a prerequisite before food is sent to those countries.
NFP works when it is taught and practiced (even in third-world nations). The only agenda is God’s design for human beings. www.onemoresoul.com
NFP vs Contraception #7, “Know the consequences.”
Contraception is recommended by doctors or ailments not related to fertility. Just because it help one thing, does not mean it doesn’t have side-effect elsewhere. Everyone knows it’s real purpose.
Get the facts. www.onemoresoul.com
Project Rachel + Natural Family Planning (NFP)
I read an article on TheFloridaCatholic.org about Rachel’s Vineyard Ministries that offers weekend retreats for women suffering from post-abortion trauma. I added the link to my Sexuality page along with Project Rachel, a ministry available in most diocese for post-abortion counseling.
I also started finding some good links about Natural Family Planning (NFP). It inspired me to finally post the lecture we had on NFP at IPF this past summer. The post is here, with some good external links also on my Sexuality page.
Natural Family Planning (NFP), Catholic birth-control
Today’s lecture was on Natural Family Planning. The first hour was a presentation in Riggie Hall by couples that teach the program from The Couple to Couple League (CCL). The second hour was back in the classroom for question-and-answer session with one of the couples. A lot of great info and lots of great questions. For the basics about the Catholic view on birth-control and contraception, check this out.
What is Natural Family Planning (NFP)? NFP is a way of following God’s plan for achieving and/or avoiding pregnancy. It consists of ways to achieve or to avoid pregnancy using the physical means that God has built into human nature. Today’s NFP should not be confused with Calendar Rhythm Method taught in the 1930’s.
NFP consists of two distinct forms: Ecological breastfeeding is a form of child care that normally spaces babies about two years apart on the average. Systematic NFP is a system that uses a woman’s signs of fertility to determine the fertile and infertile times of her cycle. Couples seeking to avoid pregnancy practice chaste abstinence during the fertile time of her cycle.
Systematic NFP consists of various “methods” or systems that seek to determine the fertile and infertile times of the cycle. The “Ovulation Method” focuses primarily on the mucus sign. Other couples use a temperature-only form of NFP, and some use the cervix sign in combination with either the temperature sign or the mucus sign. We were taught how to use a cross-checking system called the Sympto-Thermal Method (STM). It uses all the common signs of fertility in a cross-checking way.
A FREE 156 page manual is available on-line at NFP and more.org in PDF format called Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach by John and Sheila Kippley. Basically, there is a chart (blank available in pdf format) that is used to track the changes in cervix, cervical mucus and temperature daily. (In one hour, I think we learned more about the female anatomy than most married men do.) Each variable has a code at the bottom of the chart to note: (from chapter 2, pdf)
TEMPERATURE (when a woman wakes up) is taken with a digital thermometer (oral, vaginal, or rectal). Before ovulation, the waking temperature is lower than it is after ovulation. In the five or six days before ovulation, the higher levels of estrogen tend to depress or lower the waking temperatures slightly. After ovulation, progesterone causes the waking temperatures to rise.
Before ovulation, the CERVIX undergoes four changes: (1) cervix rises slightly; (2) the mouth of the cervix (cervical os) opens slightly; (3) the tip of the cervix becomes softer; and (4) the cervix secretes a mucus discharge. Around ovulation or usually right after ovulation, these changes in the cervix are reversed.
Before ovulation, the CERVICAL MUCUS first appears as a somewhat tacky substance and then becomes more fluid. It usually starts a few days after menstruation, but sometimes it can start toward the end of the period. As it becomes more fluid, the mucus becomes slippery and stretchy, and usually produces sensations of wetness on the outer lips of the vagina (the vulva).
Besides bombarding us with lots of science, they were proud to note that “We have no doubt that married couples who are properly instructed and motivated can practice the cross-checking Sympto-Thermal Method at the 99% level of effectiveness for avoiding pregnancy.”
NFP can also be used for couples who are trying to have a baby. We also had the option to visit the Pope Paul VI Institute located in Omaha, NE that does extensive medical research dedicated to providing morally and professionally acceptable reproductive health services. They include the CREIGHTON MODEL FertilityCare System and NaPro Technology that has helped women conceive children, while respecting the Catholic Church view against in-vitro fertilization.
The Couple to Couple League (CCL) offer classes for couples and have computer software to help track all the variables into cool colored charts (I could definitely see guys getting into this … like me). They said some couples have it on a laptop next to their bed (there’s something creepy about the sound of that … but I can see it happening). The software they offer is CyclePRO, but I couldn’t find a screenshot of it. I did find another popular ovulation & fertility software available called Hormonal Forecaster with many kinds of visual displays (the STM chart screenshot is shown here).
Besides all the technical info with science and the Catholic Church view on fertility, the idea of personal intimacy of a married couple started to get minimized. The couples started sharing their own lives and the application of NFP in their marriages. Through their own experiences, they recommend that the couple always do NFP together. Even though the woman’s body is where all the signs come from, the husband should be the one to record the readings to actively be involved, pay attention to his wife’s needs more sensitively and find ways of intimacy outside of sexual union during their times of fertility. They also posted a chart that concluded divorce is lowest in couples that practice NFP. The chart showed a bar graph of “divorces per 100 marriages.” In 1960’s, it was 26 per 100. In 1970’s, it was 32 per 100. In 1980, it was 50 per 100. For NPF users, it was LESS THAN 5 per 100 marriages. (I’ve got some doubt about this research … a little too good to be true … no real source cited.)
Other questions about fertility and Catholic teaching can be found here.
Some personal testimonies of Catholic couples struggling with infertility.
Recent Comments